{
  "updated": "2026-05-31",
  "purpose": "Public-safe recommendation knowledge for the Techniek Engineering client support finder.",
  "questions": [
    {
      "id": "issue",
      "label": "What kind of support do you need first?",
      "options": [
        { "value": "technical-review", "label": "Engineering review or second opinion" },
        { "value": "project-control", "label": "Project coordination or risk control" },
        { "value": "energy-performance", "label": "Energy performance or operating cost review" },
        { "value": "ai-workflow", "label": "AI, data, or workflow readiness" }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "stage",
      "label": "Where is the work right now?",
      "options": [
        { "value": "planning", "label": "Early planning or scoping" },
        { "value": "active", "label": "Active project or facility issue" },
        { "value": "stuck", "label": "Delayed, unclear, or blocked" },
        { "value": "improve", "label": "Improving an existing process" }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "outcome",
      "label": "What would help you move forward?",
      "options": [
        { "value": "memo", "label": "A clear recommendation" },
        { "value": "action-list", "label": "A prioritized action list" },
        { "value": "risk-view", "label": "A clearer risk or status view" },
        { "value": "data-plan", "label": "A data or measurement plan" }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "recommendations": [
    {
      "id": "engineering-review-sprint",
      "title": "Engineering Support Sprint",
      "service": "Engineering Support",
      "url": "engineering-support.html",
      "summary": "A focused technical review for a defined asset, system, proposal, design question, or facility issue.",
      "bestFor": [
        "A decision needs a clear technical basis before cost, schedule, or scope moves forward.",
        "An owner, operator, or project team needs a practical second opinion.",
        "A technical issue needs to be explained clearly to non-technical stakeholders."
      ],
      "outputs": [
        "Technical review memo",
        "Options and tradeoff summary",
        "Issue and risk list",
        "Recommended next-step plan"
      ],
      "prepChecklist": [
        "Decision deadline",
        "Drawings or photos",
        "Equipment or system records",
        "Known constraints"
      ],
      "match": {
        "issue": ["technical-review"],
        "stage": ["planning", "active", "stuck"],
        "outcome": ["memo", "action-list"]
      },
      "relatedBriefCategories": ["AI governance", "Digital twins"],
      "referenceLinks": [
        { "label": "Engineering support", "url": "engineering-support.html" },
        { "label": "Project experience", "url": "index.html#knowledge-prompts" }
      ],
      "keywordTriggers": [
        "design",
        "equipment",
        "technical",
        "review",
        "specification",
        "submittal",
        "proposal",
        "second opinion",
        "commissioning",
        "field issue"
      ],
      "cta": "Prepare the technical question, the decision deadline, and any drawings, photos, trend data, reports, or inspection notes you can share."
    },
    {
      "id": "project-controls-reset",
      "title": "Project Controls Reset",
      "service": "Project Management",
      "url": "project-management.html",
      "summary": "A structured review of project records, open issues, decisions, RFIs, submittals, risks, and stakeholder reporting.",
      "bestFor": [
        "A project is active but the next actions are unclear.",
        "Risks, RFIs, decisions, or submittals are scattered across too many places.",
        "An owner needs a plain-language status view without losing technical detail."
      ],
      "outputs": [
        "Decision log",
        "Risk register",
        "Open action list",
        "Weekly project status view"
      ],
      "prepChecklist": [
        "Current project phase",
        "Open issue or decision log",
        "Schedule snapshot",
        "Known responsible parties"
      ],
      "match": {
        "issue": ["project-control"],
        "stage": ["active", "stuck"],
        "outcome": ["risk-view", "action-list", "memo"]
      },
      "relatedBriefCategories": ["Project controls", "AI governance"],
      "referenceLinks": [
        { "label": "Project management", "url": "project-management.html" },
        { "label": "Industry Brief archive", "url": "archive.html" }
      ],
      "keywordTriggers": [
        "schedule",
        "rfi",
        "submittal",
        "change order",
        "delay",
        "risk",
        "stakeholder",
        "status",
        "coordination",
        "meeting"
      ],
      "cta": "Gather the project phase, the current blocker, the open action list, and any issue log or schedule snapshot."
    },
    {
      "id": "energy-opportunity-scan",
      "title": "Energy Opportunity Scan",
      "service": "Energy Management",
      "url": "energy-management.html",
      "summary": "A practical review of utility data, operating schedules, BAS trends, demand patterns, and obvious energy-waste signals.",
      "bestFor": [
        "Utility costs are rising and the cause is unclear.",
        "Energy data exists but is not yet tied to specific actions.",
        "Operators need help prioritizing what to verify first."
      ],
      "outputs": [
        "Energy-use observations",
        "Priority action list",
        "Operating constraints",
        "Follow-up and measurement plan"
      ],
      "prepChecklist": [
        "Recent utility bills",
        "Interval or meter data",
        "BAS trends and schedules",
        "Comfort or production limits"
      ],
      "match": {
        "issue": ["energy-performance"],
        "stage": ["active", "improve", "planning"],
        "outcome": ["action-list", "data-plan", "memo"]
      },
      "relatedBriefCategories": ["Energy operations", "Building controls"],
      "referenceLinks": [
        { "label": "Energy management", "url": "energy-management.html" },
        { "label": "Industry Brief", "url": "index.html#brief" }
      ],
      "keywordTriggers": [
        "utility",
        "energy",
        "meter",
        "bas",
        "controls",
        "demand",
        "trend",
        "schedule",
        "hvac",
        "operating waste"
      ],
      "cta": "Collect utility bills, interval data, BAS trends, operating schedules, occupancy patterns, and known comfort or production limits."
    },
    {
      "id": "ai-workflow-readiness-review",
      "title": "AI Workflow Readiness Review",
      "service": "Engineering Support",
      "url": "engineering-support.html",
      "summary": "A practical review of an AI use case before it is added to engineering, project, maintenance, or energy workflows.",
      "bestFor": [
        "A team wants to use AI but has not defined the decision it will support.",
        "A workflow needs data-quality checks, human review points, and safe boundaries.",
        "A public or internal tool needs to avoid exposing FCI, CUI, export-controlled data, credentials, or private files."
      ],
      "outputs": [
        "AI use-case scorecard",
        "Data and source map",
        "Human review workflow",
        "CMMC-aware public/private content boundary"
      ],
      "prepChecklist": [
        "Decision the workflow should support",
        "Source documents or systems",
        "Who reviews AI output",
        "Information that must remain restricted, sanitized, or owner-approved"
      ],
      "match": {
        "issue": ["ai-workflow"],
        "stage": ["planning", "improve", "stuck"],
        "outcome": ["data-plan", "memo", "risk-view"]
      },
      "relatedBriefCategories": ["AI governance", "Building controls", "Project controls"],
      "referenceLinks": [
        { "label": "Industry Brief archive", "url": "archive.html" },
        { "label": "Project experience", "url": "index.html#knowledge-prompts" }
      ],
      "keywordTriggers": [
        "ai",
        "automation",
        "agent",
        "workflow",
        "data",
        "knowledge",
        "google drive",
        "documents",
        "private",
        "cmmc",
        "cui",
        "fci",
        "controlled",
        "prompt"
      ],
      "cta": "Describe the decision, users, source documents, review owner, and whether any information may be FCI, CUI, export-controlled, credentialed, or client-confidential."
    }
  ],
  "publicSafety": {
    "allowed": [
      "Approved service descriptions",
      "Public AI Engineering Brief content",
      "Generalized project situations",
      "Public process descriptions",
      "Non-confidential example outputs"
    ],
    "notAllowed": [
      "Client names",
      "Private project history",
      "Proposal details",
      "Financial performance",
      "Confidential files",
      "FCI, CUI, export-controlled technical data, credentials, or contract-controlled records",
      "Google Drive documents unless explicitly approved for public use"
    ]
  }
}